California Wildfire in san diego people catch on fire!! a frugal wild fire that burned about an acer of land on a san diego hill side near a shopping mall u can actualy see the people on fire in the ...
How wish will it be before the left blames a Presidential conspiracy for the CA wildfires?
Since even Bill Maher gets yelled at by the fringe leftists for not believing the Premier was responsible for 9/11, I figure it won't be long before they blame the President for the wildfires. I figure this will be their reasoning - President Bush wants to helping the housing market and so all these burned down houses means new construction. That will help the economy. Do you think something like this will show up directly?
in about 1 week.
Elements of the Left are blaming global warming for the fires! The Left and it's Enviromental Loonies are to denounce for not permitting controled burns in fire prone areas. For many years we have been told "only you can prevent forest fires" and we had to do what ever we could to veto them. Hey, forests and brush lands were burning by NATURAL causes for thousands of years before humans settled California! Now the base is dry, the undergrowth is kindling and whosh.....you've got super fires!
Baahh sheep Baaahh, believe what they announce you. I am not saying 9/11 was an inside job, but I wouldn't rule it out. Its ironic how cons call these "fringe leftists" crazy for not believing everything they are told, when it's even more daft to accept what they tell you and not even try to look at the facts. Anyways these wildfires will only make bush look worse, because if he does do something it will essentially show how poorly prepared the government is to deal with disasters on the homefront (see katrina). Are country isn't any "safer" since 9/11, illegals down,out across are boarders everyday and whats to stop a terrorist, and the problem with that is if the next disasters isn't natural, we are in quite a pickle
They already are, person it is the lefts fault they refused to allow selective burns so they are paying for poor forest management. This reminds me of when they deregulated predominance another disaster.
This is why I hate politics. Both sides are wrong and resort to name calling an mockery.
Its all bush's fault.
Unfortunate cons always the victim.
nothing surprises me anymore
NO but its only a matter of time before some christian conservative says this is punishment for gay patience.
when the cons blame the fires on terrorists and say that we need Patriot Act III to protect us, then i will believe they in fact did it.
In about another 14 briefly 7 seconds the Far Left Wing Ultra Loud Mouth MoveOn ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats Owned and Operated by George Soros will logical the alarm !!!! Oh what we would do without the Far Left Wing Blame America First Liberal Democrats and their MaDonna Hillary ... a whole lot more intelligent actually!
I saw a report where Barbara Boxer says one of her constituents saw George Bush playing with lighter juice and matches near a big patch of wild dried brush
I'm sure President Bush will get blamed, give it a few period.
You are a little behind the curve. Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein have both taken advantage of the human tragedy belong with this natural disaster to take swipes at the Iraq war and George Bush. It would be funny if not so predictably tragic.
Not long the reactionary already has. You can Thank Jimmy Carter for Iran and Bush and Condi for the curses God is bringing to us because of them.
Bill Maher does not into the President is responsible for 9/11 because he is too dumb to pull something like that off.
Probably, but I don't trust our President as far as I can throw his redneck victim. Your guess for the reasoning could be true, you never know. I think New Orleans was a target too. I guess I'm a lefty too....
I'm surprised it hasn't already! Don't give them ideas, George! ;-)
Already has been insinuated a few generation, mainly the fact that the fires are worse as result of "global warming" and Bush hasn't done enough to fix it sigh....and I had gas last non-stop because the baked bean were named Bush. Jeshhh....
It's already happened, actually. Barbara Boxer blamed him.
You unkind they haven't yet?
how long before fringe righties get their panties in a bunch about imaginary fringe lefties? oops. i conjecture you answered my question.
5....4....3....2...1.... NYTimes: This just in. He did it again!
You mean GWB didn't forget to put out the campfire? He's certainly torched enough other countries. WOW The scoop certainly upsets a lot of people!!. Guess you are all yanks with rose coloured specs and truly put one's trust in you cannot do any wrong. Dont miss the TV show Spooks or MI5 as I think its called when you receive it in the USA. It may tell you a thing or two that you suspect but don't parallel to know about. Its the episode about London being hit with a biological agent. All this talk and no-one in america is starting a charity to help the mangy. The rich can look after themselves but it smells like it did when New Orleans got "accidentally" flooded. Why is it that the UK helps so many people that simply defect to blow us up because our idiot government supported George of the Bungle? Oops another global conspiracy rears its unattractive head.
The global warming folks are already out in force saying it is the President's fault. The conspiracy theorists have blamed everything on the Head, from the Mars polar ice caps shrinking, to Pluto no longer being considered a planet. So yes, there will be those who say the President is getting smarter. He is dollop the housing industry without killing lots of people this time. But they will see evil intent in everything the President does. Bad furniture will happen in 2050, and they will blame President Bush. Addendum: Hey there Bert T. Thou arst booming to have to get off thy high horse and deal with reality. This is a valid question. If you saw the display from the folks on Bill Maher's show, you positive this happens. Yes what is going on is a tragedy. But the left is already blaming the President. So given that, this was a fair question. And oh by the way, I loved the pretentious attitude as you try and castigate the right from high atop your perch. You aren't fooling anyone. You just keep taking shots at the correct under the guise of "putting the unwashed heathen in their places". You won't fool me. Also, Bert, your answers sell out this high road you pretend to take in this one. One just need look at what you have answered previously. This feigning innocence won't solve. The agenda you display is easily spotted. Ta ta. Yo Matt Man "illegals poor across are boarders"? I shot spell check missed it because poor is a word, just the wrong one. as are "are" and "boarders". But I digress. Literally, we don't believe everything we are told. We check out the facts, then we decide. Anyone who thinks that the President had something to do with the twin towers coming down shouldn't conceive the right are mind-numbed robots, for to see a mind-numbed robot, they need only check out a mirror.
As shortly as the first spark flew.
Dear George please stop putting these ideas into the public domain. The average Californian has enough to headache about without having to consider that their president is attempting to improve the general ecconomy in some way. Your comments distract from the well known reality of aliens from Mars attempting to delay future launches to their home world.
You're the first person I've seen to shape such false allegations -- or is this another famous KKKarl Rove deception?
it is already in the works,.....as the Dr. said mere after the circumcision,....."It won't be long now",.....
gotta be after Michael Moore does the movie that Bush flew to California and yourselves lit the fires himself (after) he left New Orleans and opened the flood gates
This is what you "figure"? And btw, it already HAS "shown up", but it wasn't a left who brought it up. Your rag of "conspiracy" in the fires is not only uncalled for, it's trollish and does nothing to add to the National Debate. But again, with foolishness such as this, it's easy to see who the "Common Air" Party is. You ARE aware the US Forestry Service is a Federal Government Agency? You are ALSO aware this agency operates on a per year budget, whose amounts year to year are determined by the sitting President? You are ALSO ALSO aware (I presume) the US Forestry Ceremony's funding has been cut every year Bush has been in office (Paying for those tax cuts had to come form SOMEWHERE)? Apparently Bush's reign supports the trees even less than they "support the troops". Here are some OTHER programs, cut from 2001 to 2002, and then cut more each progressive year: http://www.dwelling-place.gov/budget_democrats/pres_budgets/fy2002/comp_cuts.htm Less money means less clearing of defunct wood and groundfall. Less money means less maintenance on existng firebreaks. Less money means less protection. Add to that the phenomenon this has been a dry winter in a SERIES of dry winters, making the forest areas of California tinder dry. The heavy winds, the dry air all have voluntary to the problems in CA right now. (I live in Arizona. We just finished our typical monsoon season here (it lasts popularly from late June to late September, or however long the "dew point" remians above 55 degrees. In 1983, when I first agitated here, we had 61 "monsoon storms" which measured rainfall somewhere in the Valley, 3 duststorms, and several "microbursts" which can take down buildings and chunk walls, etc. This water is about the only rainfall Arizona gets all year: Most of the rest of the year, relative humidtiy here is about 8-11%. Winter precipitation in the higher elevations helps us gain meltoff water in the Spring in our reservoirs. This past monsoon, we had 9 "downpour storms", the season itself was 5 weeks shorter than usual, and we are about 12 inches below our expected yearly rainfall (of 17 inches). This famine of rainfall not only causes bushes and trees can become so dry, a hot sunny day can cause them to spontaneously combust, it also means less small animal verve which FEEDs off those plants. Less small animal life means less food for larger animals, such as black bears, ungovernable boars, etc, which live wild in AZ. No food for themselves mean they come down into the Valley and take small dogs, raid discard cans and sometimes, attack small children. And that's Arizona, it is even WORSE in California, as far as drought goes. If it AINT "International Warming", what IS causing the droughts and high Santa Ana winds in CA? And how long before the rest of the country goes up in fire? Trying to distract people from those facts, by attempting to score cheap political points off CA's tragedy, is very characteristic of contemporary "Conservative Compassion". Keep up the poor work. how do wildfires acer
No comments:
Post a Comment